|
Post by Anonymous on Apr 10, 2016 0:56:56 GMT
This also went up on january 5th, before the tweet.What is it and is it related? It must be,if it was uploaded prior to the tweet.
|
|
|
Post by DeadVCR on Apr 10, 2016 20:48:16 GMT
This also went up on january 5th, before the tweet.What is it and is it related? It must be,if it was uploaded prior to the tweet. The video seems to be related to the mobi. Therefore it is fake.
|
|
|
Post by lake of life on Apr 16, 2016 16:12:20 GMT
looking for 3301 I know how it works if 3301 see this by any chance then please solve 7 / 7 = ? to confirm
|
|
|
Post by anonymousdoge on Apr 23, 2016 19:08:04 GMT
looking for 3301 I know how it works if 3301 see this by any chance then please solve 7 / 7 = ? to confirm 7 / 7 = 1
|
|
|
Post by DeadVCR on Apr 27, 2016 20:54:21 GMT
looking for 3301 I know how it works if 3301 see this by any chance then please solve 7 / 7 = ? to confirm 7 / 7 = 1 No 7/7 = 12309823902340923948239042348723984729862398236492348923578235982359237529384728934723498 Also welcome back Anondoge.
|
|
|
Post by QuantamLeap on Apr 30, 2016 22:22:25 GMT
When you're done decrypting the book, you'll have solved the book. However, you won't have the how, why, or when. Many of you are forgetting the importance of the philosophy behind the creation of the book. Decrypt the book, and then start looking for the who. I'm not a cryptologist/stenographer, but I pay attention to human patterns and reactions. I've taken the story from start to finish, and put it all together, and have it on authority that I'm on the right path. I'm paying attention to what you guys are decrypting, and to the team I have decrypting it as well. Once that's done, the book, along with what I figured out, will give me both sides of the puzzle. I have a feeling that we're not just being given runes and things taken from the Codex Runicus. I'm pretty sure that Pythagorean tuning is involved in the final solve as well. However, I do get the philosophy behind it now...
|
|
|
Post by DeadVCR on May 2, 2016 16:42:30 GMT
When you're done decrypting the book, you'll have solved the book. However, you won't have the how, why, or when. Many of you are forgetting the importance of the philosophy behind the creation of the book. Decrypt the book, and then start looking for the who. I'm not a cryptologist/stenographer, but I pay attention to human patterns and reactions. I've taken the story from start to finish, and put it all together, and have it on authority that I'm on the right path. I'm paying attention to what you guys are decrypting, and to the team I have decrypting it as well. Once that's done, the book, along with what I figured out, will give me both sides of the puzzle. I have a feeling that we're not just being given runes and things taken from the Codex Runicus. I'm pretty sure that Pythagorean tuning is involved in the final solve as well. However, I do get the philosophy behind it now... Very interesting. The who not the what. Thanks for visiting and contributing to the forum.
|
|
|
Post by bluexmagic on May 2, 2016 17:47:16 GMT
hmm
|
|
|
Post by QuantamLeap on May 3, 2016 21:47:44 GMT
Remember, look at the whole picture. Anytime someone tells you to only decrypt the Primus, assume that they're not the type of person who looks at the big picture.
|
|
|
Post by LiteraryGenome on May 4, 2016 6:45:11 GMT
I feel like perhaps some of the clues are forcing people to get stuck in the minuscule details of the wrong places. "Can't see the Forrest, for the trees" sort of thing.
"Beware false paths"
Don't get so caught up in the tehcnicality of the clues that you forget the questions they're asking of you in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by LiteraryGenome on May 4, 2016 14:09:02 GMT
Oops *technicality SO. Has anyone read The Riddle of the Sands? In my cicada research it's popped up, and I think if you have a skim through you may find some interesting things... I could be very wrong but what's to lose? It can be found on the Gutenberg project, it's public domain... Have a look at the language, the patterns in dates used, Roman numerals and intricacies of pictures. www.gutenberg.org/files/2360/2360-h/2360-h.htm
|
|
|
Post by QuantamLeap on May 4, 2016 14:09:09 GMT
I feel like perhaps some of the clues are forcing people to get stuck in the minuscule details of the wrong places. "Can't see the Forrest, for the trees" sort of thing. "Beware false paths" Don't get so caught up in the tehcnicality of the clues that you forget the questions they're asking of you in the first place. Someone finally gets it. Now you should be able to see from my point of view.
|
|
|
Post by LiteraryGenome on May 4, 2016 14:19:14 GMT
Oh! Also, could the 1033 3301.... 0.3 be a reference to Creative Commons law? CC CiCada..0.3 because it seems this "organisation" is very much valuing anonymity, their messages saying "all intelligence is sacred" again could refer to the respectful use of work under Creative Commons. The messages they've given us have been saying that the answers are right under our noses in a very obvious way, that we are making it more complicated than it is....
The St. Ives riddle, though very very simple for example, uses mathematics to trick you, into thinking the answer to it is mathematical. However, the answer is in the story the riddle tells!
I know this approach is very left field, and if it's not welcome or seen to be useless that's fine! I can do it on my own but I just thought I'd briefly share.
|
|
|
Post by QuantamLeap on May 4, 2016 14:22:12 GMT
Oh! Also, could the 1033 3301.... 0.3 be a reference to Creative Commons law? CC CiCada..0.3 because it seems this "organization" is very much valuing anonymity, their messages saying "all intelligence is sacred" again could refer to the respectful use of work under Creative Commons. The messages they've given us have been saying that the answers are right under our noses in a very obvious way, that we are making it more complicated than it is.... The St. Ives riddle, though very very simple for example, uses mathematics to trick you, into thinking the answer to it is mathematical. However, the answer is in the story the riddle tells! I know this approach is very left field, and if it's not welcome or seen to be useless that's fine! I can do it on my own but I just thought I'd briefly share. Honestly, I'm almost certain that this isn't the case. I wouldn't focus on the name for the time being. The potential answers that I've found are weird. If I'm right, there were a ton of them, and they just weren't put together because they were posted at different times. Certain things have been getting dismissed because they would be too obvious, when that's likely the goal.
|
|
|
Post by LiteraryGenome on May 4, 2016 14:25:54 GMT
Oh! Also, could the 1033 3301.... 0.3 be a reference to Creative Commons law? CC CiCada..0.3 because it seems this "organization" is very much valuing anonymity, their messages saying "all intelligence is sacred" again could refer to the respectful use of work under Creative Commons. The messages they've given us have been saying that the answers are right under our noses in a very obvious way, that we are making it more complicated than it is.... The St. Ives riddle, though very very simple for example, uses mathematics to trick you, into thinking the answer to it is mathematical. However, the answer is in the story the riddle tells! I know this approach is very left field, and if it's not welcome or seen to be useless that's fine! I can do it on my own but I just thought I'd briefly share. Honestly, I'm almost certain that this isn't the case. I wouldn't focus on the name for the time being. The potential answers that I've found are weird. If I'm right, there were a ton of them, and they just weren't put together because they were posted at different times. Certain things have been getting dismissed because they would be too obvious, when that's likely the goal. Mm mm good point, I guess I'm just kind of covering all thought processes here. Thanks for the feedback
|
|