Kitter
Recruit Detective
Posts: 3
|
Post by Kitter on Aug 16, 2016 13:40:54 GMT
As promised, here's a copy of a post I've made on another Cicada solving forum. See what you think of it and if it could be useful somehow. I have some other interesting stuff to share, not necessarily with the same approach, as I think at this point it'd be interesting if some of us (me at the top of the list, as I don't know a thing about cypers and such! =P) tried looking at it from different angles. =DSince I first saw the LP, I was fascinated by the magic squares it contains. Surely those should be as important as the runes themselves! Then I saw a rough transliteration of the runes using the Gematria, and the 'language' resulting really reminds me of this: enochian.info/enochian-keys/ Funny enough, it's a language which makes use of 'keys' and 'magic squares'. Now, that sounds quite farfetched, but remember that Crowley was quoted before, and wouldn't be a surprise if he was a recurrent theme (if a tid bit corny imo). Now you numbers guys would like to check this out too and, who knows, get some inspiration: hermetic.com/enochia/system_enochian_magick_4.htmlhermetic.com/jones/the-system-of-enochian-magick/more-on-the-round-table-of-nalvage.htmlGood luck.
|
|
|
Post by nicelurk on Aug 17, 2016 3:34:07 GMT
Hill Cipher also uses matixes. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_cipherBut after a lot of analyzing of runes in LP ciphertext only thing that stands out is low occurrence of two same runes standing next to each other. Two same runes two-grams are 4,5 times lower than it would be expected at random distribution of runes. imgur.com/ZCytrje
|
|
|
Post by DeadVCR on Aug 18, 2016 18:15:53 GMT
Thanks so much for sharing.
|
|